With Constellation at an end for this academic year, I have wanted to look back on what I have learned in this module and summarise it for my blog.
In first term, my Study Group with Dr. A. Morgan ‘The Body in Society’ was an extremely interesting choice for me as I am interested in how the body adapts, evolves and changes with time. This study group packed a lot of information on the body through the ages, at different points in centuries, how societies coped with epidemics before an impressive breakthrough in medicine, social norms, gender roles, cyborgs and so much more.
What I loved about this study group was every seminar was different. What really helped get the information across and kept the seminars lively, was Dr. Morgan’s charismatic personality and her way of talking about all different subjects kept me both entertained and interested.
The Body in Society inspired my work on Cybernetic Organs, as I was very taken on the seminar we had on Cyborgs and Cybernetics. This particular seminar fueled the inspiration for my final outcomes for Future Generations in my project brief. I learned a lot about medical advancement and how cybernetics/technology is being used or rather, applied to the body via this study group. I’m not sure what my final outcomes would have been if I was in a different study group in term 1, as The Body in Society was a driven inspiration for my projects and work.
This study group also was a large source of inspiration for my first idea for project outcomes in Beautiful and Useable, although this changed in term 2, it’s still a prime example of how Constellation feeds us knowledge and aids our ideas for projects to match the briefs we are given.
Being transgender, and this study group covering a lot to do with the body, I was able to write my essay about Masculine Gender Identity, as I was passionate about this topic. I used multiple theories I learned from Dr. Morgan’s study group and applied them to my essay. It wasn’t as well planned out or written as I thought it could have been but it was a good introduction to Academic Writing and the level I was writing on.
For term 2, I moved into Dr. M. Woodward’s study group ‘Archaeologies of the Unseen’. This study group packed a punch with a whole lot of information on different theories that frazzled my brain and also was similiar in one or two of my seminars to my first study group in term 1, as I learned about different cultures in different time periods. For example, one seminar, Dr. Woodward played us folk music from the 16th centry I do believe it was, whilst we had to make some object from things were given beforehand.
This study group enabled me to bring my own interests to the table, as I am interested in Ancient Egypt, the process of mummification etc and decided to link one of the theories I had learned in Dr. Woodward’s seminar to my essay. The theory that carried out most of my resources and tied into my essay was the ‘Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present’ by Shryock and Smail.
This study group was a strong choice for me as an artist, because, we learned about materials and how the weather could affect them. Another prime example was a seminar with Dr. Woodward, where we learned about these men who went to the beach and tried to weave baskets but the windy weather made it difficult. Another was about perception and trying to find faces within objects like trees and rocks.
There isn’t anything I would change about Constellation. I know a lot of people moan about it, but I have found it so beneficial this year towards my work, myself as an artist and a person, as well as becoming more knowledgeable. Constellation allows us to learn and develop, as well as have open-minded discussions or agree-to-disagree civil arguements.
I have learned a lot from Constellation this year. I feel I have come out of my first Academic Year feeling more knowledgeable, enlightened and definitely a lot more open-minded. I am intrigued about Constellation level 5 and what theories I can learn next, or what can be applied to my level 5 work.
Made or Grown
Much Ado About Agency
Materials shape what you can do
The form expresses the things from what it has been made from
To draw – Hard surface, certain pen, light and gravity
To what extent dothe things we make express the context and environment in which theyare made?
Are things made by human practitioners or grown amidst tensions and resistence between things?
Illusion of plans and step by step instructions and other forms of creation (habit) hides layers of complexity
Flat-pack houses) Ikea style
We are taught by step by step processes but know we cannot build everything in this manner
Instructions are not always as simple as they seem
Intelectual and Theoretical Concepts
Put into action pre-conceived plan
Create and object
See Making a Project (Ingold 2013, p.20)
Ingold says it hides the work of materials
Hyleomorphism – theory of creativity
Bringing together matter to create form
(Aristotle, Metamorphosis 1029a8)
Formal Cause – efficient cause – material cause – the statue
We can trace backthe genisis of the form to the practitioner
If you accept Aristotle’s theory you would come up with this consideration
Who did the work?
Agency is the capacity of the the agent to act in the world
Human-being, or soul in religion
someone who has a consciousness or a will
Materials are not really dead, they have grains and resistence
Properties and Forces that bend in space
A magnet is a good example as it bends space and time
Are they not alive and active in the world?
Temporatities – drystone brick walls
Other forces make and change the world can move the wall and need repair
Shifting of position of wall overtime , the weather, earth movement and plant life can dislodge the stones
an agent can be any element that bends space around itself and makes other elements depend upon itself and translateits own will into its own (Callen and Latour 1981. p.286)
the capacity for materials to act
He questions an agency
It is not a propery but the emergent product of the invisible tension of the activity
A pot – brain, body, wheel and clay
the interactions of the stages – a system of things
Agency as an emergent property
the things make an extension of the agent or the agent becomes the control of the agent
The things we make emerge between things
Making is Growth (Ingold. 2013. p.21)
The maker intervenese with daily processes, a world that is always in existence
Even if the maker has a form in mind it is not the form that creates the work, it is the emergement with the materials
How formarises through movement and about dynamic properties of materials
Weather conditions canchange dynamicswhen making a basket on the beach
A dance of agency
Resistence and response to materials
Can we say that what we do always come fully formed prior to the actvity of doing it?
What become of the notions of design or making when we’re thinking this way?
What does the study of design and made artefacts in this way tell us aboutthe process of creativity?
The folk music Martyn Woodward played was relaxing and quite chirpy. The task was to play around with the materials given to us whilst listening to the music clip that was about 7 minutes long. I became quite absent minded about 2 or 3 minutes into the music and just started to roll the plastercine around in my hands. The notion of doing this reminded me about my cats’ fur and how the material felt soft like I stroking their fur.
After this exercise, we were given another task that related to materials. We had to highlight what we thought were the most important aspects of this piece of writing that spoke about students going to the beach to learn how to weave baskets.
Drawing a Shape
Invisible inter-relationships – body, pencil, pen, paper and surface
What it takes to draw
Light, gravity, pencil/pen, hard surface and atmosphere
Thinking through practice a language of materials
Materials have their own language
“The body hides from view in everyday experience” (Johnson, 2005)
Thinking through materials not just with the body – see Pallasamaa, 2009
We forget materials through industrial production and efficiency, algorithms, tools and procedures
Design has many different disciplines
“But we tend to intellectualise materials and tools (Pallasmaa, 2009, p.54)
How do material, tool, shape movement, thinking and perception?
The tool is an extension and it will shape the mind and our perception
The tool is an extension of the hand
The hand is no longer a hand when it takes hold of a hammer
We think through tools
An ecology of the mind (Batesen, p. 973, p.429)
We think through tools and environment
The tree and the axe (Batesen, 2000, p. 317)
Tools are incorporated into our body schema (ibid.p.141)
The world of tactile objects extend
Not an object that is perceived but an object that is perceived through
The unwritten laws of materials
Art does not reproduce the visible rather, it makes visible
Gravity grow like a seed(Klee. 1964. p.31)
Form is set by the process of giving form, which is more important than form itself (Klee,1965.pp45-46) See sand figures
Lines are grown, dynamic movement, the paint seen in a dynamic term as an agent
The Phenomenology of Painting Merleau-Ponti. 1964,p127)
Painting is a way of understanding our existentialist place in this world
We just dont see the world, we touch the world, we feel the world (JacksonPollock)
Making visible, visible invisible forces, gravity for example
Light has a force, it has a language
To draw we may angle the paper towards the light
Language of materials and context renders visible through practice
To think about everyday life and the materials that hide from our attention, whilst always shaping and allowing it to do what we do
Tools, materials and environment shape our movement, perception and thinking
Tools and materials leave a trace upon things we make just as our imagination and intentions do
Line render visible the language of materials and tools
In my Constellation seminar last Thursday, we had the activity of choosing a shape and then drawing it with either a pen, pencil or chalk. I had chose a pen as that’s a medium I always like working with. The person next to you had to hold the piece of paper up, whilst you drew the shape in the air. Then we had to write A and B, before drawing a line between the two, whilst they were held up in the air.
I think the point of this exercise was learning how different materials work with gravity or how they don’t work, as I know someone in my study group struggled with the chalk. I found it difficult to draw anything straight as it came out wobbly due to how the paper kept moving as I tried to draw the shapes in the air.
Perceiving the World
Seminar 2 4-2-16
“The world is as I expect it;
Imagination, Ambiguity and Perception”
Attention video from Simons and Chabris 1999
The aim of the seminar is to think about the statement above
How our imagination plays a constructive role in how we perceive the world as well as informing us
Imagine there is no life here except that which you give to it
Theory on comics
You give life to the comic by reading the book
A double reality of pictures
Drawing, paintings and photographs are objects in there own right (Gregory, 1970, p32)
The great divide for paradigms of perception is whether for example it is a passive reaction of the world of object or actively constructing it
Realist Vision 1903 Ernst Mach
Picture of the Visual World 1903 – Known as the Machian Snap-shot theory
The field is constructed briefly from snap-shots
At each end of the eyes there is continual movement (Gregory p209)
30-70 Hz of rapid eye movement of your eye
Eyes have blind spots
Primary qualities – objective
Secondary qualities – subjective
Kg – weight does not exist in this world as it does not have a primary objective quality
Physical properties are always relational to the organism looking at it
Colour does not appear in the world as we know it
“Perception as a hypothesis”
Perception is a matter of selecting the most likely object
Seeing the present with shared objects of the past
Use of ink-blot
You need a form of reference to read it
Human apprehension of the present world is always indirect – constructed by history of our experience (Gregory 1970)
Neurological Model of Perception
Our history and development of our individual neurological system determines perception
But are we “meat sticks” or is there something more?
What about the imagination?
Construction Theory 1901
Metaphor’s, ideas, description
Retinal images eventually selected stored images from the brain – (Gregory)
The picture mysteriously transfers to the mind (Jastrow)
Imagination – (Jastrow 1899 p32)
Not all neurological structure must be something more
We see what we expect to see only partial aspects of what our imagination allows us
What we imagine can be very real
How do styles change in time?
Warburg cited in Gombrich1970, p217
“Much of what we think we speak or read comes from memory”
Perception is Projection
We always relate to what is familiar to us
Our drawings reveal the way the imagination (our memories) shapes our perception of the world
Gombrich (1960) 1974 p64
Copying is a process of schema and constructions
For next week
Ambiguity – find an object from your own practice
Economy of line and brushwork – pre-selection of one form or another
Use of white-screen
Use of un-noticed or invisible
Trace and describe image or object, is it ambiguous
Describe an active relationship between the work and the viewer
Describe it in such a way as to learn how to write/talk about the artefact
Archaeologies of the Unseen:
Correspondence between Bodies, Artefacts and Environments
Dr Martyn Woodward
Access documents on Moodle: Home>ADZ4999>Archaeologies of the Unseen
Sessions run until March 17th
3-5pm room 0.116 (management building)
2-3pm Group Tutorials, Heartspace
No Session in week 4 (18th Feb)
Academic writing skills workshops are available – check Moodle for dates
Formative assessment hand in – Thursday 5th May between 9-6
An academic text of around 2500 words (physical and digital)
PDP (reflective text) of 1000 words on your blog.
Each week there will be a key text for the session, posted on Moodle.
Things to bring each week:
A copy of the weekly reading to reference
Send Martyn your blog address
Key terms from this lecture:
Ocularcentrism – The belief that the sight is the most true and important of the senses.
Embodied knowledge – The way that we experience the world through our body and senses.
A visual way of knowing the world
Pallasmaa says that sight is seen in western culture as the most reliable sense and it is the way that we describe or think about the world.
Vision is a dominant power in our construction of the world
signs, images, guide us in our physical world
Knowledge is analogous to vision
We know the world through vision.
Light regarded as the metaphor of truth
‘I see what you mean’
‘Shed light on the problem’
Our knowledge of the world is primarily visual, because our method of investigation is.
19th – 20th century, study of the world as dominated by visual means
Microscope, telescope, x ray, all show the invisible visible, thus helping us learn about it.
Pallasmaa says we have privileged sight and sound over other ways of knowing. 2005, p.16
Vision; to know the world
Touch, taste, smell etc; to feel the world
We always know things through the body, we are just not as aware of it
An Embodied knowledge
Knowledge comes from the experience of your body in the world, it is not separate from you
Our experience comes from the relationship between our body, brain, and world
We are aware of what we see, but not of our seeing
Embodied meaning making starts with the movement and experience of the body.
Reflects on the body’s way of knowing
Write a word in uppercase and lowercase and pay attention to how it ‘feels’
compare the differences
Theory of all words being onomatopoeias-
Words for air and ground in different languages – sound softer and more flowing for air, harder for ground
Continuous and cursive consonants
The sounds of the words describe things in the way that we experience them bodily.
Lines express the kind of movement that makes them. In this way when we look at lines done in different ways we can feel how the lines were created.
The feeling value of lines. Nancy Aitken.
How different lines are automatically associated with certain emotive words.
McCloud, S Understanding Comics
Describes things with visual images (sour, spiky, cold etc)
What is drawing?
Pallasmaa – Observation and expression, receiving and giving.
Outwards and inwards.
What is a drawing?
A drawing records not just the tree but the way that it is being experienced.
Book: Ways of seeing, John Berger
Comparing 2 images of an olive tree, being looked at by a camera, and Van Gogh
Neither are objectively true.
Van Gogh painting – as is experienced through an embodied subject.
Photograph – Experienced through a technological subject.
Things to think about;
Experience and knowledge is more that visual, it is embodied.
We can reflect upon this embodied knowledge through focusing on our bodily movement and feeling.
Write a reflection on your blog about the word writing excersize (200 words approx)